Proctor and Gamble swooped down on a Connecticut housewife who designed a pre-teen skincare line called Willa. P&G, obviously a beauty industry giant, is the maker of a salon haircare line called Wella. P&G claimed Willa was too close to the brand Wella and would confuse consumers.
Proctor & Gamble threatened a lawsuit.
Instead of laying down and playing dead, Christy Prunier, the maker of Willa, fought back. Explaining that Willa was named after her 11 year-old-daughter and that the line is for pre-teen girls, Prunier said there was no real case here.
Prunier had already gotten US Trademark clearance to use the name Willa and had no intentions of backing down from bringing her line to market. As media learned of the impending court date in Manhattan, Prunier gained sympathy as the underdog.
In a surprising turn of events, P&G has backed down and agreed to settle out of court. This is, in deed, a victory for all small beauty brands. Unfortunately, the battle costs Prunier $750,000. It is unknown if this will be reimbursed in its entirety in the settlement she’ll receive from P&G. Prunier is not allowed to discuss the details of the settlement.
Proctor and Gamble swooped down on a Connecticut housewife who designed a pre-teen skincare line called Willa. P&G, obviously a beauty industry giant, is the maker of a salon haircare line called Wella. P&G claimed Willa was too close to the brand Wella and would confuse consumers.
Proctor & Gamble threatened a lawsuit.
Instead of laying down and playing dead, Christy Prunier, the maker of Willa, fought back. Explaining that Willa was named after her 11 year-old-daughter and that the line is for pre-teen girls, Prunier said there was no real case here.
Prunier had already gotten US Trademark clearance to use the name Willa and had no intentions of backing down from bringing her line to market. As media learned of the impending court date in Manhattan, Prunier gained sympathy as the underdog.
In a surprising turn of events, P&G has backed down and agreed to settle out of court. This is, in deed, a victory for all small beauty brands. Unfortunately, the battle costs Prunier $750,000. It is unknown if this will be reimbursed in its entirety in the settlement she’ll receive from P&G. Prunier is not allowed to discuss the details of the settlement.
Read how Whole Foods is requiring accountability from "organic" brands.
Check out this enlightening film about the chemicals that affect our lives.
How truthful are "before" & "after" ads for beauty products?
Our youngest fan shares her concerns about toxic cosmetics.
Post is filed under News & Info -This entry was posted on Tuesday, October 18th, 2011 at 12:16 pm and tagged with P&G. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
Find Us On
Sign up for our Newsletter